SOME THOUGHTS ON
UPCOMING VILLAGE ELECTION
1.
An option would be to run three people as a
party. All with a central theme: to open up the village governance. Perhaps there could-would be other central
issues. The group of three would use an
identifying name, to counter the village status-quo group.
2.
The group would immediately call for a revision
of the Village open meetings policy.
3.
The group would insist that any policy being
discussed would first be shared with the public, and then, after that input, a
specific policy would be voted on. No business should be allowed to keep secrets
from us for proprietary reasons. The board is first and foremost responsible to
the citizens, not to an outside business.
4.
The group needs to push for a project manager to
oversee all projects being started in the Village. Projects need to have
timelines adhered to, fiscal accountability, and be able to show how any
particular project will meet the needs and desires of the citizens. And perhaps
what kind of payback we might expect.
5.
This group should stress that the directors are
in charge and accountable for the direction of the Village, with input from the
general manager. The general manager should not be in charge of the Village. He
or she is not elected. The general manager is advisory.
6.
This group should make it clear that the
committees used in the Village will be given projects and will be able to make
suggestions about goals and directions the directors are planning before the
fact, not after. The committees need a great deal of empowering. The current
situation is like a cheerleading system devised for the directors. It is an
affront to the very capable people we have in the Village. All the expertise
and potential leadership we have in the Village needs to be utilized to the
fullest extent.
There might well be other themes
that the three persons might emphasis. This is my first impression of what at
least six might look like.