The Old Man Said to Me:

• When you think you understand the "truth," start over.
• Don't let everyday problems take you down. That's what tomorrow is for.
• Listen. Look around. You're talking way too much and doing way too little.
• God is a good idea. But if it's a crutch you want, go to the hospital.
• Human beings are all the same. Forget color, language, disability, faith, clothes, ethnic origin, sexual orientation. We all have to sit on the pot when nature calls. We all have to figure out what kind of toilet paper to use.
• Make sure the treasure you seek is the treasure you need.
• If you waste a lot of time, eventually you'll run out of it.
• On the other hand, the old man said, "Don't get too excited. What happens happens. Don't make it personal. You're not that important."

QUOTE OF THE DAY

"HELL IS---OTHER PEOPLE."  Jean-Paul Sartre

"SOME DAYS, HEAVEN IS---OTHER PEOPLE."   The Peever

As US Bombs Iraq and Syria, Who Exactly Is Being Killed?

As US Bombs Iraq and Syria, Who Exactly Is Being Killed?



KILLING FOR KILLINGS SAKE, AND THEY DON'T CARE WHO. EVERY HUMAN IS CONSIDERED COLLATERAL DAMAGE. 

Mississippi Sued Over 'Hellish' Conditions in For-Profit Prison

Mississippi Sued Over 'Hellish' Conditions in For-Profit Prison



Surely not in progressive Mississippi.

QUOTE OF THE DAY

"People look for the underlying truths in religion. In doing so, they factualize many of the stories. They do a disservice to their religion by doing so. They take away its mystery. In culture after culture, the truths are metaphorically told. The truth is the metaphor."

The Peever, Onward Christian Soldier

Bill McKibben Reacts to President Obama’s Climate Summit Speech

Bill McKibben Reacts to President Obama’s Climate Summit Speech

QUOTE OF THE DAY

"PERHAPS THE MOST REVOLTING CHARACTER THAT THE UNITED STATES EVER PRODUCED WAS THE CHRISTIAN BUSINESSMAN."

H. L. Mencken

I'M BACK

BACK AFTER AN EXTENDED ABSENCE. STAY TUNED.

Nearly 500 Hundred Arrested as Fast-Food Workers Rise Up

Nearly 500 Hundred Arrested as Fast-Food Workers Rise Up



FAST FOOD NATION.

SHOULD VILLAGE HAVE A RECALL BY-LAW?

There is presently no provision for a recall vote in the Village. It is not written anywhere, but neither is most of what the Directors are currently doing. (Secret meetings, secret votes, signing contracts without our knowledge). Since we are not a governmental body, but a private club, I'm thinking we can do whatever we want. And I'm thinking it should involve removing the Board of Directors. They are detrimental to our future. Although frankly, I do think we should become a municipality. At least the leaders would have some rules they would have to follow. (We should probably keep this secret).

GUEST EDITORIAL

Dear Village Friends and Neighbors,

 

I typically do not share political views with anyone, but the upcoming election impacts all of us. Our Village community is at the crossroads of success and failure.

 

You are receiving this email because you are in my private email address book. If this email comes to you as an intrusion, I sincerely apologize and ask you simply delete my message.

 

As you may know, the General Manager and Board of Directors will be asking all voters to choose a position, either FOR or AGAINST the Two-Tiered Assessment proposal. If by chance, you happen to be unhappy with how this plan has been deployed or if you’re interested in supporting a just cause to stop this plan from being thrust upon us, I want to share with you, the formation of a new group called "Villagers for Responsible Change.”  This organization of Villagers has assembled a “VOTE NO” campaign. We believe there is a chance of stopping this proposal if we organize a strong opposition NO VOTE. Our audience is both, non-resident and resident property owners of developed and non-developed lots.

 

Board Director Frank Leeming tried to stop the vote at the August 20^th  Board meeting but was unable to do so. He proposed that the two-tiered assessment plan be tabled until further analysis can be made of our financial needs. He felt this was critical before we move forward with the current plan, or any plan.

 

As a resident property owner, I believe that we need to get back on solid financial ground and avoid the forecasted deficit. The Future Financial Task Force predicts, if the two-tiered assessment plan passes, we will face yet another deficit in 2019.  We need more than a "Secure Tomorrow" we need a Secure Day After Tomorrow, and Secure Decade and Beyond.  Why should we settle for only 5 years of financial stability? I surely hope to be here much longer than that!

 

If you agree that we deserve a better alternative than the two-tiered assessment as proposed, please consider VOTING NO.

 

I encourage you to pass this email on to your fellow Villager property owners. This message needs to be shared.

 

You may also visit the VOTE NO web page and Villagers for Responsible Change Facebook page:

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/VillagersforResponsibleChange           Please like us and share us with your friends.

Website:  http://VoteNo2Tier.com/index.html

 

At the August 20^th board meeting there was a simple alternative presented by a brilliant, long-term resident of HSV. It's called the “$14 Plan." Simply put, this plan calls for a $14.00, across the board, increase in the assessment. Non-resident and resident property owners will share equally in bringing our Village back into a financially stable position. In fact, this plan will put nearly $1M MORE DOLLARS into our bank account than the two-tiered assessment plan.

This plan will bring our monthly assessment up to $50.68 per month / $608.16 per year. This buys us the distinct privilege of owning a piece of this incredible community.  If you believe in the Village's future, does $50.68 per month sound unreasonable? Sounds like a bargain to me! This amount is significantly lower than most other similar communities. Keep in mind that this is not the only viable alternative.  There are others.  However, first things first, as they say. We are asking NON-RESIDENT and RESIDENT property owners to understand that this plan, and other viable plans,  need to be considered for many good reasons which are documented in detail on our web site. 

 

To do this, WE (non-resident & resident voters), need to band together and strike down the two-tiered assessment initiative at the ballot box by VOTING NO.

 

Like most Villagers, I understand that we need to invest in our future; that our assessment fees have not kept pace with inflation; that the health of our infrastructure and future depend upon remedying our financial situation.  However, until we identify a plan that clearly spells out realistic numbers, until we have leadership that believe non-resident and resident property owners should be treated equally, until clear lines of accountability, responsibilities and transparency are assigned, it is detrimental to the future of the Village to move forward with ANY plan.  Have look at the chart below. It should put our numbers into clear perspective:

 

	Current Assessment		Two-Tiered Assessment Proposal Schedule for Vote		1 option: $14 / Month Across the Board Increase
Developed lot (water meter)	$36.68 / mo.	$440.16 / yr	$65.00 / mo	$780.00/yr ($339.84 increase)	$50.68 / mo.	$608.16/ yr ($168 increase)
Non-developed lot (no meter)	$36.68 / mo.	$440.16 / yr	$36.68 / mo	$440.16/yr (0 increase)	$50.68 / mo.	$608.16/ yr ($168 increase)

 

 

Why is our leadership so stuck on a two-tiered assessment plan?  Our General Manager and the Future Financial Task Force used the past increase of $4 as the reason that owners “walked away from their lots.”  Our GM and Board of Directors are afraid to increase the fees for non-resident property owners for fear of more abandonment and moreover, losing their vote.  The number of lots that fell into a delinquent posture over the past years is absolutely not a result of a mere $4 increase in assessments.  Property owners walked away from their lots because the National Economy tanked in 2008. The real estate market all but halted during that time.  NRPI went belly-up and abandoned thousands of lots.  Our property values took a nose dive and to this date have still, not recovered.  The GM’s and Board’s assumption is simply incorrect. 

 

In summary, the Village for Responsible Change, would like you to visit their website.  We believe there are common threads that run among us – resident and non-resident property owners.  Preservation of our Village, equitable treatment of all our members, Democratic treatment of all viable options and financial stability for more than just the immediately future.

 

Please consider VOTING NO to help us get the opportunity to do it right the first time.  We may not get another chance. The future of our Village depends upon it.

If you agree, please help this message go viral and share this information with all of your friends.

 

Thank you for your consideration,

Dan Daddieco

Proud Citizen of Hot Springs Village

GUEST EDITORIAL

Another surprise, if you look at the Protective Covenants posted on the website you’ll notice another potential travesty against the members, a paragraph “32” has been added (buried in a group of other normal revisions) by your Board.  The paragraph was added at the request of Twiggs. 

Yes, the changes were voted on in open meeting May 21^st but with little fanfare, only Atkins recognized and took exception to this “OVERLAY ZONE” (defined as an area in HSV where the Protective Covenants DON’T apply) and if you watch the video of the meeting (the last 10 minutes or so) the other Board members voting for it seem oblivious to the implications and dangers this could present with no restrictions stated what so ever. 

If an area is so designated by a Board (as in a secret meeting) a “pig farm” or “subsidized housing” or “equestrian center” or “mobile home park” can be put in the “designated” area of HSV and you have nothing to say about it.  You might want to go back and ask the Board members that voted for this what is their motivation for making HSV vulnerable?

 

Larry Frazer
Have a Great Day!!